Lloyds coalition files for GMP equalisation ruling in High Court

James Phillips
clock • 2 min read

Lloyds Bank has launched a joint legal bid with its pension trustees and unions to equalise guaranteed minimum pensions (GMPs) in a move which could cost the industry £20bn.

The coalition is seeking to close an estimated £2,000 per year gap between men and women in the bank's three defined benefit (DB) schemes. This affects approximately 230,000 women who joined the schemes between 1978 and 1997 and substituted their state pension for a higher private pension.

At the time, GMPs were calculated based on women receiving their state pension five years earlier than men, at age 60.

The claim, if successful, could cost Lloyds up to £508m, but consequently land the wider contracted-out DB sector with a £20bn bill.

The action was mooted by the Lloyds Trade Union last August, but now the union, trustees and bank have announced paperwork for the case which has been jointly filed with the High Court, with a trial expected later this year.

They are filing a ‘part 8 claim' to get a definitive ruling on whether there is an obligation for trustees to adjust benefits to ensure they are equal, if there is a correct method for doing this, and how the trustees should exercise their powers.

A Lloyds Banking Group spokesperson said: "This relates to a longstanding industry-wide issue about how differences between equality and pensions legislation impact occupational pension schemes. The group supports the trustee in seeking a resolution so that it can bring an end to decades of uncertainty and provide clarity to interested parties."

The issue has caused headaches for the industry since a 1990 judgement in the European Court of Justice said men and women should have the same retirement date for benefits.

Last year, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) proposed a method for GMP equalisation where a scheme does a one-off calculation to find whether a man or woman has the higher benefit, with the lower benefits then uprated. That GMP is then converted into an ordinary scheme benefit.

However, issues around divorce settlements, transfers, buyouts, and defined contribution schemes with GMP underpins require further exploration.

James Phillips
Author spotlight

James Phillips

Professional Pensions journalist from 2016-2022

More on Law and Regulation

Budget IHT move a 'major adverse change' to the tax treatment of UK schemes

Budget IHT move a 'major adverse change' to the tax treatment of UK schemes

Fieldfisher calls for clarification over scope of death benefits subject to new regime

Jonathan Stapleton
clock 31 October 2024 • 2 min read
List: The DC and DB benefits being targeted for IHT purposes from 2027

List: The DC and DB benefits being targeted for IHT purposes from 2027

Treasury docs reveal the extent of plans to include pension death benefits in IHT regime

Professional Pensions
clock 30 October 2024 • 1 min read
PPF publishes s143 valuation assumptions consultation response

PPF publishes s143 valuation assumptions consultation response

PPF confirms ‘marginally overfunded’ schemes will be able to use discount rate for s143 valuations

Martin Richmond
clock 29 October 2024 • 2 min read
Trustpilot