Employers face being sued if they take minimal approach to AE

James Phillips
clock • 2 min read

Employers which pay just lip service to their auto-enrolment (AE) duties risk being sued if members fail to receive good outcomes, according to Royal London and Eversheds Sutherland.

Legislation requires employers to do little more than enrol and re-enrol eligible staff into a pension scheme, pay contributions, and notify workers of their rights. Yet, employers should regula...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Pensions

Become a Professional Pensions Lite Member today

  • Three complimentary articles per month covering the latest real-time news, analysis and opinion from the industry
  • Receive important and breaking news stories via our two daily news alerts
  • Hear from industry experts and other forward-thinking leaders

Join now

 

Already a Professional Pensions
member?

Login

James Phillips
Author spotlight

James Phillips

Professional Pensions journalist from 2016-2022

More on Law and Regulation

Budget IHT move a 'major adverse change' to the tax treatment of UK schemes

Budget IHT move a 'major adverse change' to the tax treatment of UK schemes

Fieldfisher calls for clarification over scope of death benefits subject to new regime

Jonathan Stapleton
clock 31 October 2024 • 2 min read
List: The DC and DB benefits being targeted for IHT purposes from 2027

List: The DC and DB benefits being targeted for IHT purposes from 2027

Treasury docs reveal the extent of plans to include pension death benefits in IHT regime

Professional Pensions
clock 30 October 2024 • 1 min read
PPF publishes s143 valuation assumptions consultation response

PPF publishes s143 valuation assumptions consultation response

PPF confirms ‘marginally overfunded’ schemes will be able to use discount rate for s143 valuations

Martin Richmond
clock 29 October 2024 • 2 min read
Trustpilot