California Public Employees retirement System
US
US - The California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) will review forecasts of capital market returns in preparation for the adoption of a new three-year asset allocation policy in December.
12 May 2010
•
US
US - Californian schemes have dismissed the conclusions of a study by the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR), which claimed the funding level of the three largest Californian pension funds has so far been understated due to the accounting...
09 April 2010
•
US
US - The California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) is looking to gain exposure to direct infrastructure assets while building strategic relationships with other investors.
08 April 2010
•
Defined Benefit
US - The funding level of the three largest Californian pension funds has so far been understated due to the accounting rules used, a study by the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR) revealed.
06 April 2010
•
Consultants
Raquel Pichardo-Allison discusses the changing relationship between pensions funds and their consultants, and asks whether consultants will need to share their role with third-party providers.
15 February 2010
•
Socially Responsible Investing
Lynn Strongin Dodds looks at the rising trend towards timber investment and the many routes investors can take
07 December 2009
•
US
US - The California Public Employees' Retirement System's (CalPERS) president Rob Feckner has urged the other members of the fund's board to support laws which would submit placement agents to the same rules as lobbyists.
12 November 2009
•
Admin / Technology
Charlotte Moore looks at how investors are increasingly targeting the clean technology sector and how it can bring high returns
30 October 2009
•
Securities Lending
Those pension funds most committed to securities lending felt the impact of the economic crisis more than most. Despite this many funds are now moving back to this sector, as Richard Lowe reports
30 October 2009
•
US
US - CalPERS will be reviewing the fees paid to third party marketers by its money managers after it learned one manager paid over US$50m to a firm owned by a former board member.
15 October 2009
•
