Rory Murphy: A call for a permanent, independent pensions commission

Body would assess the pensions system and make policy recommendations to ministers

Jonathan Stapleton
clock • 2 min read
Rory Murphy: Pensions have long term outlooks that can stretch decades into the future
Image:

Rory Murphy: Pensions have long term outlooks that can stretch decades into the future

The establishment of a permanent, independent Pensions Commission would ensure the interests of pension funds and their members are “front and centre” of ministers’ minds, Rory Murphy says.

The chair of trustees at the Merchant Navy Officers Pension Fund (MNOPF) has long supported the establishment of an independent commission – writing an article setting out the case for a permanent pensions commission for Professional Pensions in April.

Speaking to PP as part of the PP Pensions Commission, which is bringing together industry opinion and ideas on the future of pensions to send to the new government, Murphy said an independent commission could help resolve any "occasional disconnects" between the interests of ministers and scheme members.

Murphy said: "The interests of ministers and the interests of pension fund members frequently coincide but there are, inevitably, occasional disconnects.

"Pensions have long term outlooks that can stretch decades into the future. Ministers' priorities are ultimately (and understandably) fixed around the electoral cycle. As a result, pensions policy can, however well intentioned, be reactive (addressing problems that should have been prevented), and even counter-productive."

He explained: "A permanent, independent pensions commission would ensure that the longer-term interests of pension funds and their members are kept front and centre of ministers' field of vision.

"Such a body, made up of representatives from the pensions industry, employers, members, trade unions, academics and voluntary organisations, would provide an ongoing assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the pensions system. It would be able to make policy recommendations to ministers, who would remain in charge of implementing policy but who would be required to publish their response to the commission's recommendations."

Murphy added: "This approach would not curtail the powers of government to implement pensions policy. It would, however, ensure that policy is aligned as closely as possible to the long-term interests of pension funds and their members, leading to better outcomes for all."

 

This article was published as part of Professional Pensions' PP Pensions Commission – which is bringing together industry opinion and ideas on the future of pensions to send to the new government

More on Law and Regulation

Are regulatory changes in scheme management a burden or a boon?

Are regulatory changes in scheme management a burden or a boon?

Questioning the advice and costs of external providers can yield significant benefits

Rory Murphy and Terry Webster
clock 04 September 2024 • 5 min read
Robin Ellison – If only Rachel Reeves played golf

Robin Ellison – If only Rachel Reeves played golf

PP’s regular columnist wonders if latest change proposals will add value

Jonathan Stapleton
clock 29 August 2024 • 10 min read
Do recent cases suggest that TPR's enforcement task is becoming harder?

Do recent cases suggest that TPR's enforcement task is becoming harder?

Claire Carroll and Laura Norris consider the impact of TPR’s policy

Claire Carroll and Laura Norris
clock 28 August 2024 • 6 min read
Trustpilot