Ian Bell – Cross-party approach to pensions needed

Longer-term approach would allow people to plan for retirement with greater certainty

Jonathan Stapleton
clock • 2 min read
Ian Bell: The current approach fails to recognise that we have a slow burning crisis building
Image:

Ian Bell: The current approach fails to recognise that we have a slow burning crisis building

The next government should form a cross-party working group to address pension issues, RSM UK says.

The audit and advisory firm's head of pensions Ian Bell said saving for retirement was a long game – but noted the current approach, where pensions policy depends on who is in government, encourages short-termism.

He said: "We'd like to see a cross-party working group established which would enable people to plan for retirement with greater certainty.

"Auto-enrolment (AE) is a great example of what can be achieved when all parties work together to address pensions issues. It's been successful in ensuring the majority of workers save into a pension, however it doesn't go far enough in terms of the amount saved. The current approach of automatically saving 8% of salary lulls workers into a false sense of security and means they often don't stop to consider how much they should really be saving. Many are unaware that the 8% of salary saved into pensions under auto enrolment is unlikely to be enough to guarantee a comfortable retirement. 

"We'd also like to see a commitment to better financial literacy, so younger generations understand that saving for retirement is not just an older person's issue. Raising the 8% AE amount has already been acknowledged as necessary, however, as it's unlikely to prove a vote winner, particularly in the current economic climate, no parties are addressing it directly in their manifestos.

"The current approach fails to recognise that we have a slow burning crisis building that will come back to haunt retirees and governments in years to come, unless all-party action is taken to resolve it."

This article was published as part of Professional Pensions' PP Pensions Commission – which is looking to bring together industry opinion and ideas on the future of pensions ahead of the general election on 4 July.

Send your thoughts and ideas to the PP Pensions Commission via email to [email protected].

More on Industry

Industry 'encouraged' by draft CDC code but warns of 'unnecessary' burden

Industry 'encouraged' by draft CDC code but warns of 'unnecessary' burden

The pensions sector has responded to TPR’s consultation on the new CDC code of practice

Holly Roach
clock 13 February 2026 • 6 min read
Industry in favour of moving new public sector staff into DC schemes

Industry in favour of moving new public sector staff into DC schemes

PP poll finds 79% of respondents back findings of report by Policy Exchange

Martin Richmond
clock 13 February 2026 • 2 min read
Professional Pensions: Stories of the week

Professional Pensions: Stories of the week

Deloitte scheme and Standard Life’s £700m buy-in, Aviva fast-track process for buyouts, WTW BPA market predictions

Professional Pensions
clock 13 February 2026 • 1 min read
Trustpilot