PPF proposes bespoke s143 valuation assumption for smaller schemes

Lifeboat fund says current assumptions are understating the liabilities of smaller schemes

Jonathan Stapleton
clock • 2 min read
Shalin Bhagwan: We hope these proposed changes will have a positive impact on marginally overfunded smaller schemes that enter our assessment period
Image:

Shalin Bhagwan: We hope these proposed changes will have a positive impact on marginally overfunded smaller schemes that enter our assessment period

The Pension Protection Fund (PPF) has launched a consultation on proposed changes to the assumptions it uses for certain valuations which provide an estimated price for securing PPF benefits with bulk annuity providers in the buyout market.

The lifeboat fund said that, when a scheme's employer becomes insolvent, triggering the entry of an eligible defined benefit (DB) scheme into a PPF assessment period, a section 143 (s143) valuation...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Pensions

Become a Professional Pensions Lite Member today

  • Three complimentary articles per month covering the latest real-time news, analysis and opinion from the industry
  • Receive important and breaking news stories via our two daily news alerts
  • Hear from industry experts and other forward-thinking leaders

Join now

 

Already a Professional Pensions
member?

Login

More on Law and Regulation

Government confirms it will maintain pension fund clearing exemption

Government confirms it will maintain pension fund clearing exemption

Announcement follows industry representation on the issue

Professional Pensions
clock 10 January 2025 • 2 min read
Top tips for trustees and sponsors on pensions litigation

Top tips for trustees and sponsors on pensions litigation

Peter Murphy explains that litigation involves a lot more than just going to court

Peter Murphy
clock 10 January 2025 • 4 min read
The impact of the Manolete v White judgment for debtors' pensions

The impact of the Manolete v White judgment for debtors' pensions

Chris Edwards-Earl looks at the implications of November’s Court of Appeal ruling

Chris Edwards-Earl
clock 08 January 2025 • 3 min read
Trustpilot