Spring Statement: Goodwin remedy to cost £425m

Equal survivor benefits will be paid in the future and backdated them to December 2005

Jonathan Stapleton
clock • 1 min read
The cost of remedying the Goodwin discrimination case brought against the Teachers’ Pension Scheme will be significant
Image:

The cost of remedying the Goodwin discrimination case brought against the Teachers’ Pension Scheme will be significant

The government’s remedy to the Goodwin discrimination case brought against the Teachers’ Pension Scheme (TPS) will cost an estimated £425m by the 2026/27 fiscal year, Spring Statement documents reveal.

HM Treasury policy costings - released alongside the Spring Statement today (23 March) - detailed the cost of remedying sexual orientation discrimination in the TPS and other affected public sector schemes.

The Goodwin case concluded in June 2020 that a female member in an opposite sex marriage is treated less favourably than a female in a same sex marriage or civil partnership - finding that this treatment amounts to direct discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation.

It said that where schemes contain provisions deemed discriminatory, those provisions must be disapplied as being contrary to the non-discrimination rule set out in section 61 of the Equality Act 2010.

The government's remedy to the case will see the government pay out equal survivor benefits in the future and backdating them to 5 December 2005.

It said this will result in some one-off survivor pension payments and higher payments going forward.

The Treasury added that some public service pension scheme members may have made additional pension contributions to provide higher survivor benefits to their spouse, which will be refunded.

Costings by the Government Actuaries Department (GAD), based on data provided by TPS administrator Capita, shows the impact of this remedy will be £60m in the 2021/22 year, £140m in the 2022/23, £75m in 2023/24 and £50m in each of the subsequent three financial years.

HM Treasury noted the data provided by Capita is based on outturn for the TPS thus far - adding that the costing was therefore "uncertain" and sensitive to future outturn data.

More on Law and Regulation

SPP: Build it and they will come? Considering the case for multi-employer CDC

SPP: Build it and they will come? Considering the case for multi-employer CDC

John Wilson asks if sponsoring employers are ready to make the move to CDC

John Wilson
clock 26 November 2024 • 3 min read
Budget IHT move a 'major adverse change' to the tax treatment of UK schemes

Budget IHT move a 'major adverse change' to the tax treatment of UK schemes

Fieldfisher calls for clarification over scope of death benefits subject to new regime

Jonathan Stapleton
clock 31 October 2024 • 2 min read
List: The DC and DB benefits being targeted for IHT purposes from 2027

List: The DC and DB benefits being targeted for IHT purposes from 2027

Treasury docs reveal the extent of plans to include pension death benefits in IHT regime

Professional Pensions
clock 30 October 2024 • 1 min read
Trustpilot