Expected living standards in retirement fall back in Q3

Lower return assumptions for growth assets driving decline in expected outcomes

Jonathan Stapleton
clock • 2 min read
Aon's UK DC pension tracker fell steeply during the third quarter
Image:

Aon's UK DC pension tracker fell steeply during the third quarter

The expected living standards in retirement provided by defined contribution (DC) savings fell during the third quarter of the year, Aon says.

The consultant's UK DC pension tracker fell steeply from 62.8 to 58.4 over the quarter and is now lower than it was at the start of the year. Aon said this suggests members are, on average, expected to have a lower standard of living in retirement than they were expected to have at the end of the previous quarter.

Despite this, Aon said the headline fall masked a more complex picture for the different age categories.

The expected retirement incomes of older members - the 50-year-old and 60-year-old - were broadly flat over the quarter. Their DC tracker scores fell mainly as a result of the update to the Pension and Lifetime Savings Association's Retirement Living Standards in October, meaning a higher income is required to achieve the same standard of living.

By comparison, the youngest member (30-year-old) expected to see a decrease in their retirement income (in real terms) of around £1,000 per annum. Aon said the 40-year-old member expected to see a smaller reduction of around £500 per annum.

The firm said a reduction in the return assumptions for growth assets (such as equities) since the previous quarter impacted younger members in particular as they had the longest time until retirement. It said this was offset slightly by the increase in expected returns on defensive assets, such as corporate and government bonds, which benefits members near retirement more, and continued strong actual investment returns over the quarter.

Aon's UK DC pension tracker

Source: Aon

How does Aon's DC pension tracker work?

Aon's DC pension tracker is constructed by projecting the expected retirement income of four sample DC savers to each individual's state pension age and then comparing these figures to the ‘moderate' retirement standard suggested by the living standards.

Where appropriate, it is assumed that individuals use income drawdown to convert their DC funds into an income in retirement. Figures are in ‘today's money', state pension benefits are added, and tax is deducted to give a projected post tax retirement income.

This post-tax income is compared to the retirement living standards for a single person living outside London by scaling the projected income against the minimum, moderate and comfortable living standards.

The result is that someone achieving exactly the target comfortable retirement standard would have a tracker score of 25, someone achieving exactly the moderate retirement standard would have a tracker score of 11 and someone achieving exactly the minimum retirement standard would have a score of 0.

The scores for the four sample DC savers are combined to give the overall tracker value each quarter. If all four individuals meet a comfortable standard, the overall tracker value would be 100.

More on Defined Contribution

DC savers at risk of 'advice gap' at and in retirement

DC savers at risk of 'advice gap' at and in retirement

Gap could see savers miss out on knowledge required to make retirement decisions

Jasmine Urquhart
clock 25 November 2024 • 3 min read
DC master trust outcomes 'significantly improved' since 2022 gilt market volatility

DC master trust outcomes 'significantly improved' since 2022 gilt market volatility

Hymans says master trust members have benefited from ‘favourable’ market conditions

Holly Roach
clock 21 November 2024 • 2 min read
Major master trusts express concern over government's approach to DC consolidation

Major master trusts express concern over government's approach to DC consolidation

Smart Pension and SEI both raise concerns over chancellor’s plans and timelines

Jonathan Stapleton
clock 18 November 2024 • 5 min read
Trustpilot