TPR bans corporate trustee and its director for 'serious' failings

Jonathan Stapleton
clock • 2 min read

The Pensions Regulator (TPR) has banned a corporate trustee and one of its directors from acting as pension scheme trustees after multiple governance failures highlighted a lack of competence, capability and integrity.

A determination notice published today shows how TPR's investigators uncovered serious governance failings at Audax. These included: failure to resolve issues with the scheme's HMRC registration, failure to comply with requirements to take professional advice, carry out transfer requests, make lump sum payments or ensure effective oversight of scheme investments. 

The panel heard Audax described as a defined contribution occupational scheme which had 38 deferred members, as of its last known membership, and assets valued at almost £1.2 million. Following its establishment and savers having transferred into Audax, HMRC contacted the trustee saying they did not regard its administrator, Masons Pensions Administrator (Masons), as ‘fit and proper' and would deregister Audax if the trustee did not resolve the matter. 

TPR investigated whether the trustee was addressing the risk of deregistration by either appointing a new administrator or transferring members and assets to another registered scheme. Despite being given time to address the problem, the trustee failed to carry out either option. Eight Audax members also complained to TPR about the trustee. Complaints included that the trustee had declined transfer requests with inaccurate and inadequate explanations.

A warning notice issued by TPR also set out other serious problems with Audax's structure and governance, particularly that Audax no longer had an employer, administrator or investment advisor and no scheme bank accounts. No responsibility was taken by the trustee to resolve these issues to the benefit of the scheme's members.

In separate, but related, hearings, the panel also appointed Dalriada as independent trustee of two other schemes, the Ploutos Pension Trust (Ploutos) and Ganita Wealth Pension Scheme (Ganita). 

TPR director of enforcement Erica Carroll said: "In this case, the corporate trustee and director showed a severe lack of knowledge and understanding.

"This case shows we will ensure those trustees that fail to meet the statutory requirements and the high standards we expect in respect of scheme governance are stopped from failing other savers by continuing to be able to act as pension trustees."

The determination notices can be viewed on TPR's website here:

More on Law and Regulation

Budget IHT move a 'major adverse change' to the tax treatment of UK schemes

Budget IHT move a 'major adverse change' to the tax treatment of UK schemes

Fieldfisher calls for clarification over scope of death benefits subject to new regime

Jonathan Stapleton
clock 31 October 2024 • 2 min read
List: The DC and DB benefits being targeted for IHT purposes from 2027

List: The DC and DB benefits being targeted for IHT purposes from 2027

Treasury docs reveal the extent of plans to include pension death benefits in IHT regime

Professional Pensions
clock 30 October 2024 • 1 min read
PPF publishes s143 valuation assumptions consultation response

PPF publishes s143 valuation assumptions consultation response

PPF confirms ‘marginally overfunded’ schemes will be able to use discount rate for s143 valuations

Martin Richmond
clock 29 October 2024 • 2 min read
Trustpilot