Government rules out review into impact of pension tax relief

Jonathan Stapleton
clock • 1 min read

The Public Accounts Committee’s recommendation that HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) should conduct a review into the impact of pensions tax relief has been ruled out by government.

In its response to the committee's report on the management of tax reliefs, the government rejected proposals that HMRC should formally evaluate the impact of pension tax reliefs in order to fully understand their effectiveness.

The committee had been concerned that HMRC did not understand the impact of reliefs on pensions - which were forecast to cost £38bn in the 2018/19 tax year - and did not systematically evaluate the effectiveness of many of the reliefs intended to change behaviour.

But HM Treasury said the government had already undertaken several major consultations on aspects of pensions tax relief over the last few years - including the wide-ranging Strengthening the Incentive to Save consultation in 2015, which found "no clear consensus for reform".

The government did, however, back a number of the committee's other recommendations - including one saying that HMRC should publish data showing who is benefiting from pensions tax relief and split this data by income; groups with protected characteristics such as gender, age, ethnicity; people working in the public and private sectors; and people in defined contribution and defined benefit schemes.

The government said it agreed with this recommendation and would, by December next year, publish data showing who is benefitting from pensions reliefs "to the extent data is available" - but noted there was insufficient data available to produce statistics on all protected characteristics as HMRC was reliant on data collected by third parties. HM Treasury said the government is working towards improving the information that it publishes on pensions tax reliefs.

More on Law and Regulation

Is the 'institutional spring' under threat from Gen Z disconnect?

Is the 'institutional spring' under threat from Gen Z disconnect?

Archie Pritchett says unless reform reaches savers, 2026's progress will bloom where nobody is looking

Archie Pritchett
clock 10 April 2026 • 4 min read
Is 3i v Decesare a further move away from Courage?

Is 3i v Decesare a further move away from Courage?

Kate Payne and Archana Gupta say a more robust approach may now be more defensible

Kate Payne and Archana Gupta
clock 09 April 2026 • 5 min read
PMI: Why a new pension system needs a new regulatory approach

PMI: Why a new pension system needs a new regulatory approach

Helen Forrest Hall says the future lies in regulating people rather than process

Helen Forrest Hall
clock 31 March 2026 • 4 min read
Trustpilot