The belief that maturing DB schemes should automatically move into bonds and gilts is being increasingly challenged. Kristian Brunt-Seymour explores alternatives to the traditional de-risking model.
At a glance: Schemes with stronger sponsors could tolerate more growth assets But weaker sponsors should avoid investing in more volatile assets Schemes could lower de-risking triggers and ...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Pensions
Become a Professional Pensions Lite Member today
- Three complimentary articles per month covering the latest real-time news, analysis and opinion from the industry
- Receive important and breaking news stories via our two daily news alerts
- Hear from industry experts and other forward-thinking leaders