Member probes on investments would be 'undue burden' on schemes

Stephanie Baxter
clock

Giving savers rights to probe pension funds on specific details of investments would be an "undue burden" on schemes, according to the National Association of Pension Funds (NAPF).

NAPF policy lead for stewardship and corporate governance Will Pomroy told PP he disagreed with proposals to require schemes to respond to detailed questions from members on individual investments....

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Pensions

Become a Professional Pensions Lite Member today

  • Three complimentary articles per month covering the latest real-time news, analysis and opinion from the industry
  • Receive important and breaking news stories via our two daily news alerts
  • Hear from industry experts and other forward-thinking leaders

Join now

 

Already a Professional Pensions
member?

Login

More on Law and Regulation

Robin Ellison – Regulators in the firing line

Robin Ellison – Regulators in the firing line

PP’s regular columnist says the political forces are changing when it comes to regulation

Robin Ellison
clock 24 March 2025 • 11 min read
TPR pledges to cut master trust capital requirements and create innovation 'hub'

TPR pledges to cut master trust capital requirements and create innovation 'hub'

Regulator also looking to reduce regulatory burden and ask for asset allocation info

Jonathan Stapleton
clock 17 March 2025 • 2 min read
Legal interpretation argues trustees can take broader view of fiduciary duty

Legal interpretation argues trustees can take broader view of fiduciary duty

Eversheds Sutherlands and NatWest Cushon say it is ‘reasonable’ for trustees to take cost of living factors into account

Jonathan Stapleton
clock 06 March 2025 • 3 min read
Trustpilot