A need for transparency

clock

Multi-manager strategies have allowed smaller pension funds to diversify their investments through a broad range of asset classes, but have often been criticised for their lack of transparency. Andrew Sheen weighs up the pros and cons of this approach to investing

Multi-manager strategies have long been seen as a way for smaller pension funds to make investments in a broad range of asset classes without the attendant difficulties of overseeing many different...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Pensions

Become a Professional Pensions Lite Member today

  • Three complimentary articles per month covering the latest real-time news, analysis and opinion from the industry
  • Receive important and breaking news stories via our two daily news alerts
  • Hear from industry experts and other forward-thinking leaders

Join now

 

Already a Professional Pensions
member?

Login

More on Multi-manager

Industry Voice: Multi asset - winning is mainly about not losing

Industry Voice: Multi asset - winning is mainly about not losing

On the road, foul weather creates hazards and panics drivers. In markets, drawdowns have a similar impact.

Multi-managers adapting under pressure

Traditional multi-management firms have increased their offerings following calls for more fiduciary responsibility, as Helen Fowler reports

Helen Fowler
clock 03 November 2010 •

Multi-manager: in the line of fire

While considered a good way for smaller funds to diversify, the reputation of multi-manager strategies has been tarnished, as Andrew Sheen reports

Andrew Sheen
clock 02 July 2009 •
Trustpilot